Luke 12:49-56
Thirteenth Sunday
after Pentecost Year C
August 18, 2013
First Presbyterian
Church, Clarksville
And
Harmony Presbyterian
Church
Dr. Robert Wm Lowry
It
has happened to all of us at one time or another.
You are sitting around with friends
or family and the conversation turns from vacations and stories about the kids
to politics or some other equally divisive issue. The conversation gets more focused, the
voices more rigid, the tone more severe.
Eventually the atmosphere gets so tense you could cut it with a
knife. That is when someone asks the
question.
Every tense conversation has “the
question.” It might change from group to group or family to family, but it is
always there. When the conversation gets
tough, when the tension gets too high, when friendships and relationships are
starting to strain, someone asks…”how about this weather we’ve been having?”
Your question may be different. In my family, we ask “what about the
Cardinals this year?”
No matter what your question is,
that old stand-by to break the tension in polite conversation is always
available: the weather. The most neutral
and neutralizing of questions. Asking
about the weather is like tossing baking soda on a grease fire. It tampers the flames and tempers the
situation.
How about this weather we’ve been
having?
Living in a community visited by
Jesus must have been a double edged sword.
On the one hand, this increasingly famous Rabbi was coming to our town-
maybe even our street! We like to think
of the crowds being quiet and reverent and standing in rapt prayerful
attention, but part of me things that someone as famous as Jesus must have
caused at least a bit of a stir. After
all, he was the theological rock star of the early first century. It might not have been quite as much bedlam
as the Beatles landing at JFK on their first American visit or Justin Beiber
coming on an arena stage to screaming throngs of teenagers. But Jesus coming to town was a big deal.
The other side of the equation,
however, is the fact that what Jesus brought was more controversial than a mop
haircut or saccharine pop lyrics. When
Jesus came to town, the status quo began to tremble. What Jesus taught stood as a challenge to the
assumptions about how the world works and how God works in and through the
world.
What, I wonder, happened when one
who heard Jesus teaching brought what they heard home? “I was in the square today and heard this
rabbi talking. He says that the law is
fulfilled in him.” How would his devout father who observes and respects the
law of Moses reply? What about the
mother who spent the day preparing the kosher supper?
Jesus’s teachings must have come
into homes and families like a ticking bomb waiting to explode and exploit
different opinions and perspectives in the same household. Conversations around dinner tables after a
Jesus question was dropped in the middle of the conversation must have taken a
turn for the tense. Let’s face it,
there is no way to talk about Jesus’s teachings without things getting at least
a little tense. After all, most of us
were taught that you don’t discuss politics, money or religion in polite
company. There must be a reason behind
that advice.
So when Jesus’s words started to
make things tense, someone acting as self-appointed peacemaker would ask the
question: “how about this weather we’ve been having?”
Someone would turn the relief valve
to let the tension out of the situation and give everyone a chance to get back
to normal- to ratchet the passion down a notch- to keep things from coming to the boiling point
when a household is divided against itself- father against son and daughter against
mother and…
But wait.
That can’t be right.
I
seem to remember Jesus saying something about that whole division of the family
thing.
From now on, a household of five will be
divided—three against two and two against three. Father will square off against son and son
against father; mother against daughter and daughter against mother; and
mother-in-law against daughter-in-law and daughter-in-law against
mother-in-law.”
He
knew that if we take that word home and live with it and wrestle with it and
hold fast to it, the world as we know it is going to be turned on its
head. He goes on to say…
“Do you think I have come to bring peace to
the earth? No, I have come to bring
division.”
Jesus
knew that his word would threaten and upset the status quo and he warns us from
the very beginning that if we take it seriously- if we stand with and in his
word- we may find ourselves in uncomfortable or even conflicted
circumstances.
If
just to drive the point home, Jesus even warns us about changing the subject
back to the weather! Why, he demands, do
you keep talking about the weather? Your
heads are full of clouds and wind directions when what you really need to be
talking about- really need to be thinking about is the Word of God revealed to
you here and now. Stop being distracted
and start tending to the work of the Word of God.
Left
in the distant past, Jesus’s words stand as a reminder of the importance of not
neglecting the message of and priorities of God. They nudge us toward a greater willingness to
draw near and hear God’s Word.
But
Jesus’s words never stay in the distant past.
They are right here. Right now.
Jesus’s
message is not speaking to us from far away in the distant past. And as is the case with Jesus’s words, they
speak the truth.
And
I think that is perhaps the most terrifying thing about this text.
Just
as when he first said them, Jesus’s words often bring division and conflict and
even discomfort.
And
just like the people who first heard them, we would rather talk about the
weather than live in the midst of the tension of the Word of God.
Jesus
knew that and knows that so before we even have a chance to do it, he warns us
away from asking the question; he warns us away from changing the subject.
You
will find my words disagreeable, he says, but don’t even think about bailing
out to talk about the weather!
This
lesson from Jesus leaves us in a bit of a quandary. He tells us that his word will lead to
division and even rancor not just in the world but in our own households. That doesn’t sound too pleasant.
“Do you think I have come to bring peace to
the earth? No, I have come to bring
division.”
I
was unsure how to get past my surface discomfort with this text until yesterday
afternoon. I was watching some news
show- I cannot remember which one- and two commentators were blathering on
about politics. One was defending
Congress saying that they were absolutely right and the President was
absolutely wrong while the other one did the opposite. Neither was willing to give any ground. Neither was willing to even listen to the
other one. Neither was willing to see
even a shred of truth in what the other had to say.
It
occurs to me that we tend to read this text from Luke through that lens;
through the lens of our contemporary political divisions which present
themselves as absolute, inflexible and intransigent. We read this text as if Jesus is saying that
households will be divided completely and in every way possible just like our
modern politics are.
On
second glance, it becomes pretty clear that Jesus is not saying that at
all. He never says that father will
square off against son because one of them is absolutely right and one is
absolutely wrong. That is how the church
tends to read this text traditionally, but I am not convinced that Jesus is
really saying that. In fact that reading
of the text seems to go against what scripture says about our comprehension of
Jesus’s teachings and about God.
None
of us can be absolutely right in our knowledge of God because none of us can
know God absolutely. Jesus is not
warning us that only some will know the whole truth while others will know none
of it. What I hear Jesus saying here is
that his word is so big, so vast that no one person can know it fully. As Paul would later say to the Christians at
Corinth, we all see through the glass dimly.
The
conflict Jesus brings is not simply conflict between those who see and those
who do not see but between those who see but do not see the same thing.
One
of the persistent conflicts in the church is how to use our resources. Some think the church should sell all of its
property and use every dime to help those in need. That is certainly a biblical notion- Jesus
tells the wealthy young man to give away all that he has to the poor. Others think we need to preserve our sacred
spaces because the church needs a place set aside in the world for the worship
of God. That too is biblical. When Jesus tears apart the temple it is
because it is being misused not because it is unnecessary.
If
living in the family of the church teaches us anything, it is that people of
good faith can and often do disagree.
Two people may read the same words and find vastly different meanings.
When
Jesus tells the crowd that he comes not to bring peace but to bring division,
he is acknowledging that at times his teachings will lead to differences of
opinion that run deep and may even have the tendency to divide families over
the interpretation of his word.
He
knew that would happen and he makes no attempt to keep it from happening. Instead, he warns us from doing what we so
often do; change the subject. When the
sparks begin to fly and we risk lighting a fire in our midst, when we begin to
disagree…
…
“how about this weather we’ve been having?”
We
throw some baking soda on the fire to keep it from getting out of control. We douse the flames before they can get too
big.
Still,
Jesus warns us against doing that; he warns us against avoiding the discomfort
and even division that may come from his word and instead calls on us to lean
and live into it. Fundamentally this
text is a call to courage amidst the ambiguity of a life of faith. It is about recognizing that none of us has
fully comprehension- full knowledge- full grasp of the Word of God or even the
words of Jesus.
It
is telling, I think, that Jesus does not say that the household that is divided
three against two is driven apart.
Father may rise up against son but the text says nothing about the
father casting the son out of his home.
Beneath the visible division, there is an unspoken unity that
exists. Yes we may be divided over our
understanding and interpretation of Jesus’s words, but we are still one
family. We may lack uniformity but, in
Christ, we retain our unity. We are
still family.
The
limits of our own spiritual imaginations may drive wedges between us, but
somewhere, perhaps deep down in the bottom of our souls, Jesus holds us
together. Since almost the beginning the
church has been a house divided- East and West, Protestant and Catholic,
Presbyterian and Methodist- you name it.
Yet from the beginning, the people of God though divided by doctrine and
discipline are united in the unbreakable bond of Christ.
This
is a text about having courage in that bond- about putting our faith in that
bond- about trusting that bond to hold us together even when our house is
divided against itself.
When
we can learn to trust our unity in Christ and look beyond the discomfort in our
own household of faith;
when
we quit changing the subject;
when
the living gets tough; when we stop putting out the fires of spiritual passion
in our midst;
we
become the fire that Jesus came to cast upon the earth.
The
fire of the Spirit;
the
fire of the passion of the people of God;
the fire of the word of God proclaimed and
lived.
May
the flames of the Spirit be fanned in our midst and may we, as a family in
Christ, have the courage not to change the subject but in our unity in Christ
share the light of that flame with the world.
Amen
and amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment