Acts8:26-40
May
3, 2015
First
and Harmony Presbyterian Churches
The
Reverend Dr. Robert Wm Lowry
Before we get into this
text from Acts, I have to make one observation.
Sometimes the bible doesn’t make sense.
I don’t mean the confusion that plagues our modern
minds when we read about demons and angels or the challenge to our scientific
logic when we read about miracles or even the persistently puzzling narrative
of the resurrection.
Those are theological and textual issues and they
train you in seminary to work with those.
What I am talking about is the little stuff. Those little moments when an important plot
element just makes no sense whatsoever.
Like this text today.
It makes perfect sense that a eunuch would be the
treasurer to the Queen. Eunuchs were
court officials and were presumed to be more trustworthy since they were free
from other distractions.
It makes sense that he was on the road back to
Ethiopia because there was thriving trade between the empires and the only way
to easily get from the heart of Rome to Ethiopia was to travel around the edge
of the Mediterranean and Jerusalem was a major stopover on the route.
It even makes sense that Phillip would speak to the
man since this was at the height of the early church movement and the spread of
the gospel.
What doesn’t make sense is the essential plot
element that gives Phillip the reason to go and speak to the man in the first
place.
Where did he get a copy of Isaiah??
It isn’t like he went by the used Torah store and
picked up a copy of the Holy Scriptures.
It was extremely rare for a scroll to be outside of a synagogue, and
even rarer still for it to be in the hands of a non-Jew.
John Calvin explains away this little plot issue by
chalking it up to divine providence. God
needed this story to happen in a certain way and so it did. And I suppose that there is something to
that. My Presbyterian ears are pretty
sympathetic to “it was providence” being the answer to a question like
this.
Then again, maybe it was a coincidence. Maybe Phillip just got lucky and happened
upon the one person whose conversion would be a story for generations. Who knows?
The bottom line is that this Ethiopian fellow was by the side of the
road reading Isaiah when along came Phillip; it happened. However it happened to happen, that is what
happened.
So, here we are finally out of Jerusalem where the
last few weeks have kept us as we began this journey with the apostles into the
days, weeks, and months after Jesus leaves them with the charge to build the
community of faith.
Although the book of Acts is not an historical
account like a history textbook, it does help give us a sense of the general
direction of the early church both theologically and geographically. You see, the writer of Acts is the same
person who wrote the gospel of Luke. In
fact, Acts is in many ways a sequel to Luke picking up the story where the
gospel left off.
Taken together Luke and Acts paint a vivid
theological picture of the history of the church. In Luke, the action in the story generally
moves in one direction geographically- toward Jerusalem. It also moves theologically toward the
narrative of the death and resurrection of Jesus. In fact, Jerusalem and the events of the
resurrection are at the heart of the Luke-Acts story.
Acts, picking up where Luke leaves off, takes the
story from its geographic and theological location in Jerusalem out into the
world. The gospel is too big to contain
in one geographic place or even one community.
As we see throughout Luke’s gospel, Jesus is the Jewish messiah but he
is the savior of all human kind- Jew and Gentile alike. And the story of Acts reflects that. If Luke brings the story to a concentrated
focus in the Jewish holy city, Acts takes it out again demonstrating the vast
reach of the gospel and the sweeping up of the entire world in the promises of
God.
Perhaps nothing demonstrates that far-reaching
nature of the gospel than the encounter with this Ethiopian eunuch. In terms of being a foreigner from far off
lands, he was the first century equivalent of the man on the moon. That the gospel could reach him was a
profound miracle and demonstrates just how powerful the message of resurrection
is and how far we are called to share it.
When Phillip encounters the man, the eunuch is
reading from Isaiah. And not just any
part of Isaiah, but the passage that speaks of the messiah and his
suffering.
Talk
about coincidence! (Err, I mean
providence.)
Phillip
meets the man, explains the Isaiah passage to him, travels with him for a
while, and, when the man sees a pool of water, baptizes him.
The
short prose of the story gives the whole thing a sense of urgency and
action. The great preacher Frederick
Beuchner said that the Ethiopian’s excitement sounds like the babbling of a
brook over pebbles. I think it sounds
more like the water crashing over Niagra Falls!
This man has been transformed and he knows it; he feels it; he cannot
hold the joy back and even though words escape him, the joy of the moment
sounds like a thunder clap echoing around them.
It
is no wonder this is one of the most cherished stories of the New Testament
outside of the gospel narratives. It is
short but, wow, is it ever powerful!
I
remember growing up and being taught in Sunday school that this story is
important because it reminds us that we are called to share the gospel with
everyone we meet and when we do we might just help them find their way to the
Christian path and the life of the people of God.
That
was true in second grade and I still think it is true today. We are in fact called to share the gospel in
word and deed with the whole world.
Now,
do you remember what I asked you to keep in mind about this story?
At
the heart of this story of testimony and conversion is a very unlikely meeting;
and apostle of Jesus and a foreign eunuch.
As
a devout Jew, Phillip would have known, and as a man who was able to read and
chose to read the Hebrew scriptures, the eunuch likely would have known, the
passage from Deuteronomy 23 that makes clear that no one whose “testicles are
cut off or whose penis is cut off may enter the assembly of the Lord.”
In
other words, anyone who has had these irreversible things done, can never-ever-
stand righteous before the Lord because they are ritually and irreversibly
unclean.
You
can recover from a lot of things;
a
Gentile can follow the law;
a sinner can repent;
an unclean person can become ritually clean again;
but a eunuch is irreversibly unclean.
He
is beyond the limits of redemption according to the law.
Whatever
sympathy anyone might have felt for the man, there was nothing anyone could do.
That
is who Phillip stops to speak with, read with, teach, and, finally, baptize.
He
is a man from the ends of the earth AND a man so distinctively separated from
righteousness before God that only the name of Jesus Christ can redeem
him. Whether because it was happenstance
that Phillip found that man that day or the providence of God that their paths
crossed in that moment, the fact remains that in this story we have a
demonstration of the reach of the gospel in the world and in our lives. It is providence working overtime to be sure!
Phillip
stops to speak with, read with, teach, and, finally, baptize an Ethiopian
Eunuch into the household of Jesus Christ.
There is real power there and true witness to the power of the work of
the Holy Spirit in those discrete moments in our lives.
I
think that is not the only place where we see the hand of providence- the
guiding of the hand of the holy spirit- in this story. Yes, the fact that he is Ethiopian helps the
narrative along geographically by showing the gospel being proclaimed to a man
who comes from the ends of the earth and, yes, it helps it along theologically
by showing that even someone who is irredeemable under the law is still
redeemed by the resurrection of Jesus, those are vital parts of the story and
we mustn’t forget them.
But perhaps the most important lesson to us
here today, the other deeper less evident thing providence is urging us toward
in this unlikely encounter, is found not in the power of Phillip’s words or the
visible acts of the Spirit in the Ethiopian’s soul, but instead in what doesn’t
happen.
Phillip,
recognizing what the man was, knowing what that meant, and being fully aware of
the man’s status as unclean, proceeds to not say a single word about it.
He
does not say one word about the man’s physical appearance or ritual
uncleanliness.
Never
does Phillip point out to the man that he is unclean.
Never
does Phillip say that the man is bad or wrong or sinful or anything else. He starts by telling the man the good news of
Jesus Christ.
Never
does he make the ludicrous theological claim that it is possible to hate the
sin but love the sinner. If sin is
transgression of the law, the sin is part of this sinner’s very presence in the
world. To hate what makes him sinful is
to hate him and Phillip knows the gospel well enough to know that the best way
to silence good news on your lips is to harbor hate or prejudice in your
heart.
He
knows what he sees when he sees the man.
He sees someone that society, the religious community, and perhaps even
some of his fellow Christians would call unclean, unworthy, and beyond
redemption. If God hates anyone it is
this guy right here.
He
knows that is who is sitting in the cart reading from Isaiah, but rather than
walk up and snatch away the holy text from the hands of a sinner, Phillip walks
up and takes a seat next to a potential brother in Christ and begins to talk
about the Good News.
How
often do we look at the world outside of the walls of our carefully constructed
theological homes and see not sinners in need of chastising or converting but
children of God deserving of the good news?
How often do we really see through the eyes of Phillip?
Or
put another way, who are the Ethiopian eunuchs of our world?
Who
are the people that social convention and theological inertia and our own
judgmentalism have convinced us are simply too far gone to be saved or too
unclean to be associated with?
Who
are the people who just don’t deserve to hear the message of the gospel?
Whose
story is so frightening; so nontraditional; so downright sinful that it would
be better to steer clear of them to avoid being seen as guilty by association?
Perhaps
those are the very people providence is trying to get us to notice.
Perhaps,
just perhaps, those are the very people the Spirit is urging us to seek out not
to demonstrate their distance from the holiness of God but to proclaim to them
the overwhelming closeness of the love of God to all of God’s children.
Our
generous traditional reading of this text has Phillip eagerly walking up to
that Ethiopian and sharing the gospel, but I have to admit I imagine that there
was at least a little internal hesitation; a moment when he hesitated, looked
up to the heavens, and said, “seriously?
You can give me a sign to stop anytime now.”
Of
course no sign came because this is exactly where God wanted him to be in that
moment and exactly who God wanted him to encounter.
However
he got there, the point is that by the middle of the story he is sitting next
to this hideously unclean person and by the end he is welcoming him as a
brother in Christ.
The
text doesn’t say it, but I think that there might have been two conversions on
the road that day. To be sure, the text
is clear that the Ethiopian embraces the gospel and is baptized and filled with
joy. But I would wager to say that
Phillip, when he was swept up by the Spirit of the Lord and whisked away to his
next destination, was never the same again!
And if we can muster the courage of Phillip to take
providence’s queue and share the Good News with whomever God puts in our paths,
neither, I think, will we.
Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment