Let’s Talk
about Sex
Leviticus 15
This sermon was written as part of my
study group’s project on the book of Leviticus.
It was intended to be preached at a retreat and later at a conference on
emerging understandings of sex and sexuality.
Unfortunately both were cancelled.
Many of my closest friends have,
as their lives have progressed, chosen not to live as a part of the
church. At least not the church visible,
as Calvin referred to we who gather on the Lord’s Day for worship and every
other day for committee meetings. Some
grew up in households where the church was not a priority and faith was little
more than a generic background score for childhood. Others grew up as churched as I and many of
you did, yet in adulthood they have drifted in some cases and run in others
away from the church.
There are two chief reasons I
hear for people to stay away from the mainline protestant churches of their
youth. First, the church is not relevant
anymore. We, as a body, fail to speak
out about the things that most occupy human society today. While the world deals with important social
issues, we debate the number of angels standing on the head of a pin. The second complaint I often hear is that the
bible, the record of God’s ongoing story with humanity, is antiquated and has
little to say to us today. WWJD and all
that aside, the bible is just an old book that has had its day.
These complaints are not unique
to my friends. They are likely true of
many of yours and of scores of our contemporaries. And they are not unknown to the community of
the church. Go to any Christian
bookstore and you will find shelf after shelf of books on preaching, evangelism
and community ministry that purport to have found the answer to making the
church “relevant” again. Inevitably
these books focus on overcoming objections and persuasive means of convincing
the un-churched to become the churched.
They are sales manuals for the gospel giving advice on talking around
rather than against objections. Like a
creative technician facing a glitch in the works, these books don’t fix the
problem but find a work around.
I propose to take a somewhat
different tack this morning. I would
like to spend some time with you discussing a topic that is at the center of
our contemporary world and do it through the lens of a truly outdated and
antiquated portion of scripture. This
morning we talk about sex and we read from the book of Leviticus. Standing here saying that sentence, I think I
finally realize how uncomfortable my father was when he came to give me the
talk!
The book of Leviticus is divided
into two general categories: instructions to the priests and instructions to
the people. The text we have today,
Leviticus 15, is the concluding word of the priestly code. The priests were responsible for preparing
the people to come to the temple and for the preservation of the temple as a
holy place. This text concerns
cleanliness and uncleanliness and preparation for entrance to the temple.
When it comes to this text, I
have to confess that I too find it antiquated and outdated. We no longer worship in the temple. Ritual cleanliness is not a condition of
entrance to this place. And I for one
would rather go back to managing department stores than follow the detailed
instructions for the priestly class found in the first 15 chapters of
Leviticus. I leave your ritual
cleanliness to you and need no further information. There is not much that this text has to say
to us today.
Not directly, at least.
However, like so many other parts
of scripture, this text has something to say beyond what it says. In other words, in its very irrelevancy,
could this text have something to say to us?
It is no mistake that this
chapter on ritual cleanliness follows immediately the chapter on leprosy. The fear of all things physically different
is not terribly surprising. Keep in mind
that this text was written nearly 3000 years before medical science had evolved
to such advanced techniques as bloodletting and leaches and the drawing of
impurities from the bodily humors!
Although we live several
millennia after these words were first put on paper and in an era of medical
science that is based more on, well science, some part of us still resides in
this Levitical mindset; this relationship of sex, disease and uncleanliness. Despite the fact that we now know that this
relationship is based not on science but superstition, some part of us clings
to it. Some part of us still sees sex as
dirty.
Perhaps nowhere in our
contemporary society has this enduring belief in the tenuous relationship between
sex, disease and uncleanliness been revealed than in the reaction of the
Christian community to the reality of AIDS.
It seems like a lifetime ago that
the word AIDS entered our lexicon.
Throughout the mid 1980’s debate raged over whether AIDS was a public
health issue or just punishment for the gay population who were, in America at
least, its most visible victims. In the
early days of the disease, AIDS patients who were often in frequent need of
medical attention could often not find it.
Their IV medication would go unmonitored because no one wanted to risk
exposure to their blood. They would lie
helpless in bed because the nurses did not want to come near them. And far too often they died alone because no
one would risk sharing the air in the room.
We know better now. We know that AIDS is not a gay disease any
more than it is an African disease. We
know that it is an equal opportunity killer.
We know that it cannot be spread through casual contact- a hand shake, a
shared glass, a toilet seat. We have
seen significant portions of the church move from a posture of judgment and
even revulsion to one of compassion and grace.
To be sure there are still corners of the Christian community where
ignorance and hate still reign, but thankfully those are the exception rather
than the rule. For most of us, that
Levitical relationship between sex, disease and ritual uncleanliness has been
supplanted by knowledge of medicine and public health and we are the better for
it.
Here we find the witness of this
text in its very antiquity. It presents
an idea, a concept, a prejudice that has no place in our contemporary
society. In witnessing against itself,
the text speaks to the community of faith reminding us that it is to the Word
of God and not the words of the bible that we owe our faith and our
allegiance. Though the words on the page
tell us one thing, the word of God written on our hearts and in our midst by
the Holy Spirit has shown us a different, but no less faithful path.
Is that the only message this
text has for us today? Is there perhaps
something lurking beneath the words that will, if we allow it, speak a good
word to us today on the topic and question of sex?
When churches do talk about sex
theologically, we normally turn to the Song of Songs. Let’s face it Song of Songs is a lot more
appealing than Leviticus when it comes to a vision of sex. “My beloved is to me a bag of myrrh that
lies between my breasts” sounds much better than “all who touch the one with
discharge from his member must wash their clothes and bathe in water.” Like so many themes of human life in
scripture, if we spend all of our time on the pretty parts and none on the
difficult bits, we risk missing the point.
Taken together, the Song of Songs
with its poetic, romantic and often erotic image of love and sexual congress
and the Levitical admonitions to keep our bodies holy bear witness to God’s
vision that sex should be sacramental rather than merely recreational. That is the message of scripture. The message of society is exactly the
opposite: sex is meant to be recreational rather than sacramental. It is little more than an enjoyment or an
indulgence.
We who occupy the church today
must have the same courage as the writers of the Levitical law and the Song of
Songs to bear witness to God’s care for the fullness of how we use and care for
our bodies not only as physical beings but as sexual beings as well. God has something to say about sex and
because God does, the church should as well.
In a culture that glorifies sex in ways that demean rather than affirm,
there is both room and need for a word on the holiness of sex and sexuality.
Unfortunately, when we do broach
the uncomfortable topic of sex in the community of faith, we do so in one of
two general ways: the guilt model that
seeks to shame young people from having sex at all and brands sex something
dirty or dangerous and the don’t let this happen to you model that seeks to
scare them by being focused on preventing bad consequences rather than making
good decisions.
If we are to engage and encounter
this important part of what it means to be human and to be a child of God, we
must shed the comfortable veneer of our Puritanical avoidance and think beyond
terms of “should I or shouldn’t I.” The
very nature of our sexuality is central to who we are and who God calls us to
be.
Before this sermon becomes more
uncomfortable for you or for me, let me make clear that I do not plan to talk
about my own sex life or ask you about yours.
What I do want to do is pose a question to us all, is the way we are
living our lives, sexual and otherwise, honoring God and who God has created us
to be? Is the role of sex and sexuality
in our lives being lived and practiced honestly and with respect for our own
lives and bodies and those of a partner?
That is, I believe, what this
text from Leviticus is really about: honoring and respecting the gift of sex
and sexuality and remembering that God does not turn away from this part of our
lives and being just as God does not turn away from any other part.
Honor and respect are not words
frequently associated with sex and sexuality in our culture. In tv and film and even in our daily
discourse, sex has been reduced to recreation and entertainment. It has become about fulfilling my needs, my
desires, my wants. What is valued in a
partner is frequently not a sense of the unity of two people or two spirits but
the fulfillment of base and purely physical desires. Here in this old and dusty Levitical code,
we are reminded that even the physical has a dimension of the holy and the holy
deserves better than we often give it.
While the detail of the code of
cleanliness and holiness may have had its day and passed from both practice and
relevance, the message of the text that how we treat or mistreat our bodies and
the body of a partner is very much of concern to God.
What do you know? This tired old useless disposable text had
something to say after all. And as long
as the world remains as focused and centered on questions, issues and debates
on sex and sexuality, so does the church.
Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment